Why Heroes was Cancelled–and Deserved It!

[singlepic id=99 w=320 h=240 float=left] Update: I noticed you seem to like Heroes quite a bit! Did you know that Microsoft and NBC are talking about reviving the series? Check out my post about the possibility of Heroes Season 5!

Heroes Died On Its Own Sword

I remember when I began watching the first season of Heroes, a little nervous of this seeming X-Men Lite show from the very beginning. But over the course of that first season I found that very shortly I could scarcely wait to watch the next episode as the mystery of the villanous Sylar and his role in destroying New York City unfolded. The show seemed to have everything it needed: an engrossing plot, a frighteningly powerful villain with a plan, a cute girl, comic relief, political tension, the mysterious Mr. Linderman, and of course, a character with the proper soul of a Hero, Peter. I’ve talked about Heroes before, of course, and like the show itself my hopes and thoughts for its future have fluctuated from the positive to the abysmal. So goes the nature of a show that nobody had a clear vision for, and as much as I sort of wish I was, I’m not remotely surprised that it’s now officially been cancelled by NBC.

So now the question is, why was Heroes cancelled? This is a topic that could go on forever, and I’ve already reviewed a few other blogs and media outlets dishing ever so briefly on the topic, so now I think it’s time I had a bit of say, myself.

1. Let’s start with the obvious: following the first season, the show failed to ever execute a cohesive, well-planned plot or villain again. Sylar, in season one, was a masterpiece of a television villain, played to near perfection by Zachary Quinto. Season 2 didn’t really have a villain at all, Season 3’s “Villains” arc suffered a similar fate (Arthur Petrelli was OK, but really just a crusty, much less intimidating retread of Sylar), and while Season 4’s Samuel character was an interesting character, he was a useless villain with an ability so lame that all anyone had to do was run away from him in order to take it away. And while it was clear early on that the writing team on the show really tried to make the final season much better, and to a large part they succeeded, there were simply too many other problems, which we’ll get to.

2. Character development. Perhaps only a little less annoying than its plot issues was the show’s character development, specifically because, there pretty much wasn’t any. By the end of the final season, Claire was still the same whiny, self-flagellating brat she’d been since season one, only by then it had gone from being the endearing mark of a character going through something new and scary, to that place where you’re just sick and tired of hearing her whine about being different. Come on, Claire, get over it and move on, already! The same was true of One-Note-Nathan, who like any living politician stereotype, wobbled endlessly between the side of good and the side of evil. By the time he died, I was glad to see him go, and a lot of other people were too. There are only so many times you can watch the same character flip-flop back and forth. Pick a damn side and let’s get on with it.

3. Meaningless deaths. In the first season, we got some real deaths, and they were pretty damn sad. Charlie, Isaac, Simone, all were reasonably well developed (less so in Charlie’s case, but she was developed very well in a short space) and that worked out. Unfortunately, nobody ever died and stayed dead again after that. Charlie ended up being brought back during the fourth season, which really served no greater purpose than to ruin the original story’s sadness; Nathan, even after being killed in season 3’s finale, kept right on coming back to life via Sylar in season 4; Nikki, the show’s most annoying character from the very first episode, came back as a clone. Time after time, characters were shot, beaten, maimed and blown to smithereens, only to somehow return again. If there are no real death stakes, what’s the point of killing the character at all?

4. Stakes and consequences. The stakes rarely got any bigger on Heroes, either in the sense of devastating plots or in the sense of transformational character events. No, Arthur draining off Peter’s powers does not count. What characters needed were life-altering events like you’d find on better shows such as Angel or Buffy the Vampire Slayer, which was unilaterally a superior Superhero show to Heroes. There, we watched the writers do horrific things to established, recurring characters, killing off some, utterly reshaping the character of others. No character on Heroes ever faced stakes where they would have no choice but to cut down the person they love the most in order to save the world. No character on Heroes ever fell in love only to have that loved one brutally murdered before their eyes. And when Heroes characters died and returned, there was no price to pay, no shift in the balance of the world’s power, no consequences. When Buffy died while saving the world and was (months later) resurrected, there were consequences first for her character, which was fundamentally transformed by the trauma of death and bliss of Heaven, and later for an entire season as her return had triggered a shift in the balance of the world’s power that ultimately lead to the deaths of several of her allies and goodness knows how many additional innocents. Heroes never played with stakes like that.

5. Lack of advance planning. Heroes creator Tim Kring has said publicly that they do not plan the series very far in advance, preferring to write by the seat of their pants so as to always introduce new story possibilities. I suppose as theories go, that’s all well and good, but it’s still no excuse for not establishing an overall framework for where your story will go. How can you possibly write a series that says something if you don’t have anything in mind you want to say? And therein lay perhaps the root of Heroes’ problems: it doesn’t really have a message. Buffy was about female empowerment; Angel was about the neverending battle between good and evil; Star Trek was about an optimistic view of the future and humankind’s ability to succeed in it; Veronica Mars was about both female empowerment and the ability to understand and deal with the world logically even when it wasn’t very logical; Battlestar Galactica (new version) was about how humankind is a screwed-up mess with no true direction, just a fantasy.

What is Heroes about? I have no idea, and really, neither do its creators. And that was ultimately its biggest failure, and the most prominent reason why not only did it fail, but it earned its failure.


  1. Kyomatsu 02/07/2016
  2. GiraffeKey da Fantabulous 12/28/2015
  3. GiraffeKey da Fantabulous 12/28/2015
  4. GiraffeKey da Fantabulous 12/28/2015
  5. GiraffeKey da Fantabulous 12/28/2015
  6. GiraffeKey da Fantabulous 12/28/2015
  7. Brad Shujin Rhodes 10/23/2015
  8. Dan Harvell 10/22/2015
  9. Keelan Summers 07/06/2015
  10. JUMOWA 06/02/2015
  11. JasonGW 03/24/2015
  12. Ryasuke 03/24/2015
  13. Sarah 02/18/2015
  14. Sarah 02/18/2015
  15. Sarah 02/18/2015
  16. Sarah 02/18/2015
  17. Sarah 02/18/2015
  18. Sarah 02/18/2015
  19. JasonGW 01/26/2015
  20. Greloch 01/26/2015
  21. Caelah 11/22/2014
  22. Dan C 11/01/2014
  23. Rene 10/08/2014
  24. Ohhh 05/31/2014
  25. Fukyaaaa 05/31/2014
  26. yattafan 02/23/2014
  27. Shevan 02/22/2014
  28. aden 02/18/2014
  29. Oscar Emond 01/14/2014
  30. Oscar Emond 01/14/2014
  31. Bob 12/20/2013
  32. wawa 09/28/2013
  33. Zach 08/24/2013
  34. Zach 08/24/2013
  35. Dave Strum 08/13/2013
  36. Lydia 07/29/2013
  37. Daniel 07/08/2013
  38. Rachael A. Davis 06/22/2013
  39. Karin Flores 04/22/2013
  40. Anon 03/26/2013
  41. TMills4Three 03/11/2013
  42. Clairelover737537 03/09/2013
  43. StevenH 02/11/2013
  44. Oman 01/10/2013
  45. ben 11/30/2012
  46. Paul Taegel 09/28/2012
  47. Thetruth 09/21/2012
  48. Thetruth 09/21/2012
  49. JasonGW 09/19/2012
  50. SmartViewer 09/19/2012
  51. Guest 08/07/2012
  52. Evanf240 07/29/2012
  53. Gogedgar025 06/30/2012
  54. JasonGW 06/21/2012
  55. JasonGW 06/21/2012
  56. JasonGW 06/21/2012
  57. JasonGW 06/21/2012
  58. JadeWest 06/20/2012
  59. Willzyac 06/17/2012
  60. John Michaels 06/13/2012
  61. Jakerswm1983 06/04/2012
  62. ben 05/30/2012
  63. Neosuperman14 05/29/2012
  64. JasonGW 05/18/2012
  65. Tracer 05/18/2012
  66. Raven Bell 03/31/2012
  67. Jason Ward 05/24/2010
  68. JD 05/24/2010

Leave a Reply

Editorials Entertainment Events Innovations Mobile Video Games
pieces of gaming gear every nerd needs
Pieces of Gaming Gear Every Nerd Needs
Pack gaming gear safely
Moving? How to Safely Pack Your Gaming Gear
Call of Duty WWII Trailer is Gorgeous!
Apps Books & Comics Gadgets Games Movies & TV
Thor Ragnarok is the Marvel Comedy to Watch This Weekend
Review: West of Loathing – a Western Adventurer is You!
Rick and Morty Season 3 Episode 2 Review and Spoilers: What We Saw at SDCC
Computing Life Hacks
pieces of gaming gear every nerd needs
Pieces of Gaming Gear Every Nerd Needs
Pack gaming gear safely
Moving? How to Safely Pack Your Gaming Gear
family safety updates - all that nerdy stuff
Microsoft Releases Family Safety Updates
Cheap Free
Surface Pro 4
Save $400 on Surface Pro 4 256GB
Blu R1 HD Android Smartphone from Amazon
Amazon Offers Blu R1 HD Android 6 Phone for $50!
Gamestop Blast from the Past Bundle Xbox 360 PS3 Wii
Blast from the Past Bundle: PS3, Wii, Xbox 360 $159!